Talk:Christian Community Bible

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Table of Old Testament Books[edit]

I've created a section with a table that shows the differences between the Christian Community Bible, the Catholic, and Jewish orderings of the books in the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible. I am not sure what Wikipedia's footnote style is, so if anyone could correct my reference to the 17th Edition's Introduction I would greatly appreciate it.Fralupo (talk) 02:51, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Website working?[edit]

Website doesn't seem to work for me, but shows up on Google, so maybe just a temp. problem Wegsjac 16:29, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P/E and R/E editions[edit]

I was wondering what the R/E edition is.

From what I saw on the web page the P/E is the Pastoral Edition.

Does anybody know what the R/E is?

Philip

Partial copvio[edit]

THis article is in large part a copyvio from http://www.bible.claret.org/bibles/bmain.htm. -- Avocado 19:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone decides to delete this page for copyvio, please first split the Chinese section (with the "Online versions" and "References" sections) into its own article. Thank you.—Gniw (Wing) 14:15, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have split the article myself—Gniw (Wing) 05:35, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial Editions[edit]

This section cites no references. For such an important section casting doubt on the credentials of a major bible translation the author should cite sources.

Continued controversy regarding the French translation: Replacement Theology is a central tenant of Catholic Theology. This is a Catholic translation of the bible. Without replacement theology Catholicism would have no sacraments. Therefore why is this comment relevant? - Of course observant Jews are not going to like being told by Christians that Christianity fulfils the promises of the old testament, and that the new covenant fulfils and super-cedes the Old Covenant. In the same way the Christians total reject the authenticity of the Aprophrical Gospels which suggest that Jesus was only a man and not divine, while the Muslims accept some of these as proof that Jesus was a Prophet who foretold the coming of Mohammed. Such comments have a place, but not on this page which is specifically about a particular translation. Anruari (talk) 09:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]