Talk:Children's literature canon

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles

Children's literature

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Harry Potter[edit]

I have nothing against Harry Potter, but it much too soon since its publication to determine its canonical status. Gross sales does not determine canon status. Plus there are more than a few critics (Harold Bloom) who have predicted it will be largely be forgotten in a generation or two, and honestly, %99 of best sellers are, it's really just wishful thinking to put this on the canon list so soon. Fothergill Volkensniff IV (talk) 03:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I must conceed that it is possible that Harry Potter will become completely irrelevant to children's literature at some future date. However, that is not the case today. Millions of children all over the world have read and love these books. If sales do not determine canon status, what does? If time is to be a consideration in establishing this canon, it must so be stated in the lead paragraph of this article. --ErinHowarth (talk) 19:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poor list[edit]

This is an interesting list but how can Wikipedia have a canon list with no citations? It might as well be "a list that some random editor(s) decided were best". There is no mention how this list was created. It's also missing some of the most important works including Robinson Crusoe (although not written for kids it was widely read by them before there was a genre) and The Swiss Family Robinson (1812), one of the most popular kids books of the 19th century. The way to make this "list of" article is to summarize other lists created by authorities elsewhere with citations. There are tons of lists like this around that can be used as sources. Fothergill Volkensniff IV (talk) 03:47, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for potential reference[edit]

[1] This seems like a relatively scholarly examination of just this topic. I'm not sure how many people watch this article, but what do you guys think of using this as a source for expansion of this article? H₂O Shipper 23:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria[edit]

I think this is a great article, but it is sorely lacking in criteria. Whatever the criteria are for getting a book on this list, that criteria must be stated in the article. At the same time, I don't think it can be a list of books that Wikipedia editors have chosen as important, that would be original research. It would be awesome, but we're not supposed to do that here. It might only be possible to create a list of lists. There are reading and literary organization that put out lists like this such as the American Library Association and the International Reading Association. --ErinHowarth (talk) 18:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overlap[edit]

This list overlaps with List of children's classic books. Some thought should go into what the roles of these two lists are. RockMagnetist (talk) 17:41, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's also some more overlap with Children's literature timeline.. --Narayan (talk) 18:48, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a curious one. Thanks for pointing it out. RockMagnetist (talk) 23:21, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking about proposing a merge, what do you think?--Narayan (talk) 19:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone already has proposed a merge of this page to List of children's classic books. I have linked the proposal to a discussion on the talk page for that list. RockMagnetist (talk) 23:00, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]