Talk:Capture of Grenada (1779)
Capture of Grenada (1779) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Capture of Grenada (1779)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 15:05, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
I'll start this review shortly. Interesting topic! MathewTownsend (talk) 15:05, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Review
- Lede
- "French forces were reembarked on the fleet" - I guess these is military terminology but I'm not sure what it means
- "Embarkation" is a fairly well-defined concept independent of military uses... Magic♪piano 16:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- "French forces were reembarked on the fleet" - I guess these is military terminology but I'm not sure what it means
- Background
- French capture
- Aftermath
- What is the significant of John Paul Jones attending the performance?
- "In order to better defend against a similar attack to the one they launched" - I don't quite understand this sentence - maybe it's me. Rephrased Magic♪piano 16:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- "The divisions in Grenadian society" - social divisions? military divisions? Clarified Magic♪piano 16:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Caption
- Everything else looks fine. A very clear, concise article.
- I made a few copy edits that you are free to reverse.[1]
MathewTownsend (talk) 21:04, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking the time to review; I think I've addressed your concerns. Let me know if not... Magic♪piano 16:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Your careful writing and presentation is much appreciated!
MathewTownsend (talk) 17:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class French military history articles
- French military history task force articles
- GA-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Grenada articles
- Low-importance Grenada articles
- WikiProject Grenada articles