Talk:COVID-19 pandemic/GA2
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 22:24, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Auto-fail: Nowhere close to stable with tons of frequent edits plus the pandemic still is ongoing. I see this was also a concern brought up at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic/GA1 (over a year ago). DO NOT renominate the article at GAN anytime before this pandemic is over, or I have no doubt it'll fail again. On another note, I found many super-short paragraphs from a glance, which is frowned upon when those make the flow of text feel choppy. It would help to merge some or expand them. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:24, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Is this a reason to fail an article? I mean a lot of GAs and FAs were created at a time when the subject's coverage was a mere fraction of what it is now. The article is highly detailed, it's unlikely we're going to see substantial changes to it, and the pandemic may not 'be over' for a very long time. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 02:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)