Talk:British Aerospace Nimrod AEW3

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the British Aerospace Nimrod AEW3 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Technology / British / Cold War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Usage of Vectorsite references[edit]

References, by definition, are there to verify information. Therefore, they have to be verifiable/reliable. As established three and a half years ago in the F-4 Phantom's FAC review, and further discussed in WP:Aviation Archive 19's discussion on the matter, Vectorsite is not a verifiable source, that is a source complicant with WP:V or or WP:RS. Self-published sources are allowed as external links of interest, but are not good enough for the role of acting as a verifier for article content. It may be an informative personal account, but it is logically the same as using one part of wikipedia to verify another part. Please do not revert attempts to install compliant sources such as respectable published science journals as replacements. Kyteto (talk) 12:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 February 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Wikipedia's policy on article titles is to use the most common name, not the official name. Jenks24 (talk) 16:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

British Aerospace Nimrod AEW3 → British Aerospace Nimrod AEW.3 – With full stop is correct. RadiculousJ (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). BilCat (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – The period/full-stop is deprecated in current RAF usage. The move is controversial as such, and needs to be discussed first. BilCat (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the short form without the "." is more common for this time frame. MilborneOne (talk) 20:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support (obviously) – Surely we can apply the logic that the "official abbreviation" should have a full stop, whether it was common at the time or not. RadiculousJ (talk) 12:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, the short form doesnt have a full stop and they have not been used in these short from contractions for a number of years. You have to remember it is a contraction of the official abbreviation AEW Mk 3. MilborneOne (talk) 13:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.