Talk:Banca delle Marche

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Banca Adriatica?[edit]

The article name was changed, but I could not find any reference to the change in name in the official website of the bank. I'm not sure if the name was actually changed, but surely the company is still known as Banca Marche or Nuova Banca Marche, and in my opinion the article should be moved back there per WP:COMMONNAME. --Ita140188 (talk) 05:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.bancamarche.it/comunicati_stampa?read=379 CLOSING DELL’OPERAZIONE DI COMPRAVENDITA DELLE 3 BRIDGE BANKS, NUOVE DENOMINAZIONI E NOMINE DEI VERTICI

But may be Banca Marche more appropriate as a common name / trading name Matthew_hk t c 07:58, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Negative profit[edit]

@Matthew hk: I noticed you reverted my edit on the profit in the infobox. I think this notation with color and parentheses can be quite confusing. For example, there may be cases where amounts of money are in parentheses for other reasons. Also, conveying such an important information as a negative number with formatting (red color) is not really safe, as this information may be easily lost for example with a copy paste. Also, this notation in general does not seem to be standard across Wikipedia. In summary, I think just putting a "-" sign would be better. Let me know. --Ita140188 (talk) 01:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Even accounting report use blacket to show negative not - the red colour is on top of the blacket thing. Matthew_hk t c 09:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Matthew hk: yes, but as I said there are other cases where numbers can be in parentheses for other reasons. This format is only used in accounting, where numbers fit a very specific format (in a table). I think in the case of infoboxes on Wikipedia we should stick with the universally recognizable minus sign (-) as already used in almost all other infoboxes. --Ita140188 (talk) 01:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]