Talk:Artist's statement
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
attribution theory=[edit]
'Attribution theory predicts that if a person is told long enough that they are unable to interpret or perceive art that they will begin to believe and agree. ' no idea how to work this in properly into negative aspects --Meika (talk) 05:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
negative aspects section[edit]
This section is a good addition, but please refrain from original research. (I know the whole stub is uncited, but it's one thing to give uncited general information about what the statement is; an original critique of the article subject does not belong in the encyclopedia. FWIW I agree that the artist's statement probably does more harm than good, artistically. Cyrusc 21:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
1st or 3rd person perspective[edit]
What is the contemporary expected viewpoint for an artist's statement to be written?--24.187.77.211 (talk) 16:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)