Talk:21st Rifle Division (Soviet Union)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 21st Rifle Division (Soviet Union) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Russian & Soviet / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Soviet Union: Military Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force.

"of the Bolshevist Russia"[edit]

The expression "of the Bolshevist Russia" strikes this native speaker of English as too far from being enlightening. Tho i am a mere dabbler with Russian (e.g., Northern Russian dialects#Morphology does surpr!se me), i suspect the definite-article anomaly (my term) of ("school-book") Russian of having produced -- despite their manifestly vastly superior grasp of Russian-to-English translation, an error in English by my colleague. We dict-def Bolshevist Russia without the article, and in English doing otherwise would make sense only for distinguishing between the forces of B. & Czarist Russia struggling, respectively, to gain and retain/regain state power -- or perhaps distinguishing between the respective territories under their perhaps long-precarious control. (And need for such distinctions appears absent in the article's lead's context.)
That is, i'd have said "[military unit] of Bolshevist Russia", unless a distinction that escapes me is being made. (Now, AFAIK that point would have to have been made, in standard Russian, other than with a definite article. And of course maybe i know less than i imagine.)
--Jerzy•t 09:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jerzy: Why of course, you're right, the definite article is definitely not needed there. The beauty of Wikipedia is that you can fix that pretty fast you know :) //Halibu tt 09:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tnx. (I always break the rule "proofread, then save"; quite embarrassing in talk when correspondent is on line!)
--Jerzy•t 09:37, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah,"longer to read than to fix". It ain't easy bein' green
--Jerzy•t 09:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jerzy:, being a grammar nazi myself I know exactly what you mean :) And don't worry about bein' green, wear your colour with pride. I always envy the newcomers here on Wikipedia. So much to discover! //Halibu tt 13:31, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Halibutt: Uh... which newcomers do you envy?[wink]
--Jerzy•t 22:07, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]