This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Papua New Guinea, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Papua New Guinea on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Papua New GuineaWikipedia:WikiProject Papua New GuineaTemplate:WikiProject Papua New GuineaPapua New Guinea articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Where is there so little on this crisis? There is more in the article on the so-called mutiny. Can someone with access to reliable press reports add to the article. Is there any source which refers directly to eh court decision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 05:00, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There seem to be few Wikipedia editors who follow PNG politics closely. It's a recognised problem: see Wikipedia:Systemic bias. You are welcome to help out by contribute\ing to the article yourself.-gadfium 05:39, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've written a fairly detailed about it in the French Wikipedia. (I sometimes write in the English one, sometimes in the French one, by a fairly random process.) Even if you don't understand French, the French article uses English-language sources, which you can use. Aridd (talk) 22:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]